Archive for Search Google

Mar
11

Recent Changes at Google, Yahoo, and MSN

Posted by: admin | Comments (0)

Video tutorial on how to avoid getting Google slapped.

There are many changes taking place in the top search engines. Google, Yahoo, and MSN are all adapting to the many transformations occurring within the search industry. Because of these changes, I thought I would take the time to give you an overview of what’s taking place within the market and how it affects you as a webmaster. To begin, let’s start with Google.

Back in 2003, Google would index and crawl the web about once a month and everything would change all in one shot. WebMasterWorld would actually name these updates with names like Brandy, Florida, and Bourbon.

Google has moved away from these monthly updates to an ever-changing process. You can now see daily changes within the SERPS with the biggest changes occurring during algorithm updates.

Late June and July of this year saw some major changes within the Google algorithm. If your site was hurt from this algorithm change, you should re-examine your site and be sure to follow the guidelines below:

1. Pursue a continuous linking campaign with other quality sites. This can be achieved through article syndication, exchanging RSS feeds, submitting to directories or syndicating a press release.

2. Create a Google sitemap to increase the coverage of your webpages.

3. Make sure your site has a clear navigation system. Every page should be reachable from at least one static link.

4. Avoid all deceptive or manipulative behavior. Don’t get involved in linking schemes. Avoid all forms of cloaking and avoid hidden text or hidden links.

Besides the changes taking place within organic search results, there have also been recent changes within Google Adwords. In July of 2006, Google updated their landing page algorithm. These changes have harmed a number of online marketers. Many advertisers who had been paying five or ten cents a clíck are now required to bid at least 50 cents to a dolloar or more. There are also other advertisers who kept their bid prices, but those bids are now buying only 3rd or 4th page positions when they used to buy first page positions.

Some advertisers have even been effectively shutdown.

However, keep in mind that not all advertisers have been affected. There are four main types of sites that have been hit the hardest. These include:

* one page sales letter websites

* squeeze pages

* adsense sites (particularly those involved in Adsense arbitrage)

* affíliate sites

The new landing page algorithm gives a quality score to every landing page. Fortunately for us, Google has left some clues as to how they are ranking these pages.

Below are 3 general guidelines that will help those who have been hurt by the recent updates.

1. Provide relevant and substantial content.

2. Link to the page on your site that provides the most useful and accurate information related to the product or service in your ad.

3. Distinguish sponsored links from the rest of your site’s content.

To stay in accordance with the new quality score guidelines, you may want to remove all Adsense ads from your landing pages, create or find more original content for your sites, ensure that your landing page has at least 500 words, and check to make sure that your ad relates perfectly with the content of your landing page.

Google is getting smarter everyday. Our job is not to trick the search engines but to deliver truly valuable information to our visitors. By doing this along with some basic on-page and off-page optimization techniques, you should perform very well in the search engines over the long-haul.

There have also been some recent changes at MSN.

They have changed the name of their search engine spiders. Before the changes, they were all called “msnbot,”. Fortunately, they are now starting to group their spiders into separate categories.

The MSN Shopping bot is msnbot-products.

The MSN News bot is msnbot-news.

The MSN Image Search bot is msnbot-media.

The MSN search bot is still called msnbot.

It should now be much easier for webmasters to decipher what’s really going on in their web logs. In addition, webmasters can also block specific bots if they need to, without blocking MSN Search.

Last, but not least, there is Yahoo. This company has experienced some very exciting changes within the past few months.

One of these is the launch of a new Yahoo Search Crawler. The new crawler is faster and more efficient at visiting websites. As a result, website owners should notice as much as a 25% reduction in the number of requests and bandwidth consumed by the Yahoo crawler.

Yahoo also released an index update in mid-July. You can read all about it at http://www.ysearchblog.com.

In addition, there are a number of other, smaller-based search engines who are leading the way in the future of search engine technology. One of the best examples I have seen is Eurekster.com. They have developed a social search engine powered by the wisdom of crowds.

Eurekster makes use of its own SearchMemory technology, which remembers the sites a user finds useful and presents them higher in the results the next time they search. Then, Eurekster lets a user share their searches and sites with friends. For example, if you do a search on “internet marketing”, you’ll see sites related to “internet marketing” that your friends also found useful. These results are marked with an icon.

This personalization helps to increase relevancy in a way that no algorithm can match.

I expect to see many changes within Google, Yahoo, and MSN in upcoming years as they merge search engine technology with social search in order to make search results more relevant as well as personalized. One thing is clear, the future evolution of search is sure to be exciting to watch.

About The Author

Kim Roach is a staff writer and editor for the SiteProNews and SEO-News newsletters. You can contact Kim at: kim @ seo-news.com .

This article may be freely distributed without modification and provided that the copyright notice and author information remain intact.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • BarraPunto
  • Bitacoras.com
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes Fr
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • Blogosphere News
  • blogtercimlap
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • Current
  • Design Float
  • Diigo
  • DotNetKicks
  • DZone
  • eKudos
  • email
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • Fleck
  • FriendFeed
  • FSDaily
  • Global Grind
  • Gwar
  • HackerNews
  • Haohao
  • HealthRanker
  • HelloTxt
  • Hemidemi
  • Hyves
  • Identi.ca
  • IndianPad
  • Internetmedia
  • Kirtsy
  • laaik.it
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Linkter
  • Live
  • Meneame
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • MSN Reporter
  • muti
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • N4G
  • Netvibes
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • NuJIJ
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • Posterous
  • ppnow
  • Propeller
  • Ratimarks
  • Rec6
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • Scoopeo
  • Segnalo
  • Simpy
  • Slashdot
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Symbaloo
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Technorati
  • ThisNext
  • Tipd
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis
  • Upnews
  • Webnews.de
  • Webride
  • Wikio
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • Wists
  • Wykop
  • Xerpi
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Yigg
Categories : News, SEO
Comments (0)
Feb
16

Do Search Engines Care About Valid HTML?

Posted by: admin | Comments (1)

This is a HTML video tutorial on: What a document type is.What a meta tag is. Why do you need these? Creating a basic valid HTML document. How to validate HTML document.

Like most web developers, I’ve heard a lot about the importance of valid html recently. I’ve read about how it makes it easier for people with disabilities to access your site, how it’s more stable for browsers, and how it will make your site easier to be indexed by the search engines.

So when I set out to design my most recent site, I made sure that I validated each and every page of the site. But then I got to thinking – while it may make my site easier to index, does that mean that it will improve my search engine rankings? How many of the top sites have valid html?

To get a feel for how much value the search engines place on being html validated, I decided to do a little experiment. I started by downloading the handy Firefox HTML Validator Extension (http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/) that shows in the corner of the browser whether or not the current page you are on is valid html. It shows a green check when the page is valid, an exclamation point when there are warnings, and a red x when there are serious errors.

I decided to use Yahoo! Buzz Index to determine the top 5 most searched terms for the day, which happened to be “World Cup 2006″, “WWE”, “FIFA”, “Shakira”, and “Paris Hilton”. I then searched each term in the big three search engines (Google, Yahoo!, and MSN) and checked the top 10 results for each with the validator. That gave me 150 of the most important data points on the web for that day.

The results were particularly shocking to me – only 7 of the 150 resulting pages had valid html (4.7%). 97 of the 150 had warnings (64.7%) while 46 of the 150 received the red x (30.7%). The results were pretty much independent of search engine or term. Google had only 4 out of 50 results validate (8%), MSN had 3 of 50 (6%), and Yahoo! had none. The term with the most valid results was “Paris Hilton” which turned up 3 of the 7 valid pages. Now I realize that this isn’t a completely exhaustive study, but it at least shows that valid html doesn’t seem to be much of a factor for the top searches on the top search engines.

Even more surprising was that none of the three search engines home pages validated! How important is valid html if Google, Yahoo!, and MSN don’t even practice it themselves? It should be noted, however, that MSN’s results page was valid html. Yahoo’s homepage had 154 warnings, MSN’s had 65, and Google’s had 22. Google’s search results page not only didn’t validate, it had 6 errors!

In perusing the web I also noticed that immensely popular sites like ESPN.com, IMDB, and MySpace don’t validate. So what is one to conclude from all of this?

It’s reasonable to conclude that at this time valid html isn’t going to help you improve your search position. If it has any impact on results, it is minimal compared to other factors. The other reasons to use valid html are strong and I would still recommend all developers begin validating their sites; just don’t expect that doing it will catapult you up the search rankings right now.

About the Author: Adam McFarland owns iPrioritize – to-do lists that can be edited at any time from any place in the world. Email, print, check from your mobile phone, subscribe via RSS, and share with others.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • BarraPunto
  • Bitacoras.com
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes Fr
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • Blogosphere News
  • blogtercimlap
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • Current
  • Design Float
  • Diigo
  • DotNetKicks
  • DZone
  • eKudos
  • email
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • Fleck
  • FriendFeed
  • FSDaily
  • Global Grind
  • Gwar
  • HackerNews
  • Haohao
  • HealthRanker
  • HelloTxt
  • Hemidemi
  • Hyves
  • Identi.ca
  • IndianPad
  • Internetmedia
  • Kirtsy
  • laaik.it
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Linkter
  • Live
  • Meneame
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • MSN Reporter
  • muti
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • N4G
  • Netvibes
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • NuJIJ
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • Posterous
  • ppnow
  • Propeller
  • Ratimarks
  • Rec6
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • Scoopeo
  • Segnalo
  • Simpy
  • Slashdot
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Symbaloo
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Technorati
  • ThisNext
  • Tipd
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis
  • Upnews
  • Webnews.de
  • Webride
  • Wikio
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • Wists
  • Wykop
  • Xerpi
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Yigg
Categories : Design, SEO, Tips and Advice
Comments (1)