Archive for Traffic

Jan
27

Does Google’s PageRank Still Matter?

Posted by: admin | Comments (2)

Not many weeks ago, WebProNews wrote a report on the subject of Google taking out PageRank from Webmaster Tools. Susan Moskwa, a Webmaster Trends Analyst at the top search engine said, “We’ve been telling people for a long time they shouldn’t focus on PageRank so much; many site owners seem to think it’s the most important metric for them to track, which is simply not true,” she explained. “We removed it because we felt it was silly to tell people not to think about it, but then to show them the data, implying that they should look for it.” As it stands now, PageRank has been taken out of Google WebMaster Tools but it still shows up in the Google Toolbar.

I can’t figure out why Google recommends that we shouldn’t count so much on the information shown in PageRank when it’s unmistakable to every one that the majority of us bank on these numbers when reviewing the outcomes of our search engine optimization and marketing strategies and given that we agree that a high PR results in added traffic for our website then, Page Rank should be given considerable weight when evaluating our efforts.

Titus Hoskins, a Search Engine Marketer and author of ‘Does Google Page Rank Count Anymore?’ wrote in his article that, “For years, Google has been downplaying the importance of Page Rank and states that it’s only one of about 200 ranking factors which determine how Google ranks its index for keywords”, emphasized the effects of gaining high PR popularity on online companies, and I feel that a majority of what he wrote made a lot of sense.

Titus Hoskins spoke about the effect of a better page rank saying that, “Obtaining a high PR7 or PR8 simply means more business and revenues. Placed against a PR1 site, a PR8 will win more respect in the eyes of potential clients and can produce enormous profits for the site owner.”

So where does this prospective client respect emanate from? It is borne out of their respect of Google indeed. Titus Hoskins examined the respect and brand recognition Google has by saying, “Google has established an unmatched credibility and brand recognition in the eyes of potential customers visiting your site. Web users trust Google for guidance and direction”, and as an online marketer, Hoskins is astonished by how Google affects the web community. Regarding this he said, “I am completely amazed each day at the marketing power Google now commands with web surfers and with the general population.” Hoskins added, “Google is the king of online search and no other search engine even comes close to Google.”

I translate that to indicate that if Google, gives a web-based business a high PR, then count on Google’s influence to have a positive effect on the number of people purchase from that site. So how can we stop these businesses from assigning such a big premium to Google PageRank numbers?

“Regardless of what Google wants to happen,” wrote Hoskins, “PageRank is still extremely important to anyone marketing on the web, especially if you’re selling SEO services or operating a web business.” He sums up how people see PageRank as something that, “still wields tremendous influence and power” and by and large, this understanding has stayed valid up until recently. “By default, PageRank is Google’s opinion of your site,” Hoskins stressed. “Web users can count (at least to 10) and if Google believes people are still not counting when it comes to PageRank, then they are fully mistaken.”

In spite of what Google has said is their opinion I am still of the opinion that there is some benefits to be obtained from Google’s PageRank feature. I go along with the writers quoted above, and plan to continue to use Google’s PageRank in my evaluation of my own search engine optimization endeavors as well as other people’s.

Follow me on twitter.com/legalbear


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • BarraPunto
  • Bitacoras.com
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes Fr
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • Blogosphere News
  • blogtercimlap
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • Current
  • Design Float
  • Diigo
  • DotNetKicks
  • DZone
  • eKudos
  • email
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • Fleck
  • FriendFeed
  • FSDaily
  • Global Grind
  • Gwar
  • HackerNews
  • Haohao
  • HealthRanker
  • HelloTxt
  • Hemidemi
  • Hyves
  • Identi.ca
  • IndianPad
  • Internetmedia
  • Kirtsy
  • laaik.it
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Linkter
  • Live
  • Meneame
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • MSN Reporter
  • muti
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • N4G
  • Netvibes
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • NuJIJ
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • Posterous
  • ppnow
  • Propeller
  • Ratimarks
  • Rec6
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • Scoopeo
  • Segnalo
  • Simpy
  • Slashdot
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Symbaloo
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Technorati
  • ThisNext
  • Tipd
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis
  • Upnews
  • Webnews.de
  • Webride
  • Wikio
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • Wists
  • Wykop
  • Xerpi
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Yigg
Comments (2)
Aug
03

New front opened in the search wars

Posted by: admin | Comments (0)

Google’s AdSense programme is finally going to get some competition. What does Yahoo’s move into lower-traffic site advertising mean for the Web?

Yahoo is poised to launch an ad network for small Web publishers styled on a similar offering from Google, sources familiar with the plan told ZDNet UK sister site CNET News.com, a move that promises to sharpen competition between the search giants.

While Yahoo and Google already go head-to-head for major search advertising partners such as America Online, Google has largely enjoyed a monopoly serving its signature text-only ads to smaller Web sites, including blogs.

Now Yahoo plans to launch its own advertising option for small publishers, a source familiar with the plan said. Like Google’s service, Yahoo’s self-serve product will display text ads deemed relevant to the content of specific Web pages. Advertisers pay only when a reader clicks on their ad. Yahoo and publishers will split the fees.

UBS Warburg this week upgraded Yahoo on expectations that the company will enter this new arena. In a further sign that a launch may be imminent, text ads have recently been spotted on some Yahoo employee blogs.

Dan Boberg, director of business partnerships for Yahoo subsidiary Overture Services, confirmed in an interview last week that Yahoo is interested in the market, although he declined to discuss details. “We’re headed in that direction,” he said.

Yahoo’s push to expand its advertising reach comes as the market for search advertising is taking off, fuelling record revenue and profits at the Web portal. At the same time, Yahoo is busy looking for new revenue sources as it seeks to transform itself into an online media conglomerate and beat Google in the Web search game.

Tapping small publishers offers a promising growth path, given Google’s earlier efforts in this niche.

In June 2003, Google expanded its ad services for large publishers, dubbed AdSense, adding a self-serve, automated product specifically aimed at small sites. As opposed to search-related ads, which are triggered by keywords entered into its search engine query bar, AdSense ads are targeted to the content of a page and its meaning. For example, a news story about a soccer match might display a sponsored link for soccer gear.

Google does not break out AdSense sales but includes them in a broader category that encompasses all syndicated search revenue. Collectively, those businesses made up 48 percent of Google’s $3.1bn in revenue in 2004.

Bringing ads to small publishers would expand Yahoo’s current advertising portfolio, which caters to its search engine and larger Web sites.

Yahoo’s Overture subsidiary, which will be renamed Yahoo Search Marketing next month, has served ads to publisher Web pages since 2003, in a program called Content Match. The service is designed for large publishers, such as The Financial Times, and requires a vetting process to ensure quality when it comes to matching pages with ads.

Courting small publishers
Yahoo has shown increasing interest in courting small publishers of late. Speaking at the Search Engine Strategies show in New York last week, Yahoo co-founder Jerry Yang hinted that the company would do more to cater to the small content owners. Yahoo also recently released Y!Q, code that analyzes the text of a Web page and shows search results based on its content. Publishers can add the code to their Web pages to automatically generate a list of related links.

Yahoo also recently launched a publisher alert service to notify publishers of new publishing and advertising tools.

Web publishers responded positively to news that Yahoo plans to compete with Google, given Google’s unchallenged pricing power to date. Many publishers and industry watchers have also criticised Google for its rigid partnership contracts, which prevent publishers from having visibility into the total money generated from AdSense on their sites and disallow customers from talking about their paychecks.

“Great! More competition should force AdSense and others to give the publishers a bigger piece of the pie,” one publisher wrote on the Webmasterworld.com forum.

Yahoo will face several sticky issues by entering the self-service, automated side of the business. Matching content-targeted ads can also be tricky, and by opening up the service more broadly in an automated fashion, Overture could run into problems.

Google’s AdSense, for example, in the past matched a Fox News article, “Deep Fried Turkey Can Be Dangerous,” with ads to buy a deep fryer at Amazon.com.

In another problem for the industry, fraudulent Web site operators have been known to erect phony sites to bilk money from Google’s self-service ad program a strategy known as click fraud. A click thief might create a Web site featuring legal information and tips, based on the fact that legal ads often fetch high fees per click. It would then sign up with Google’s self-service program to display legal ads, and then unleash an automated bot to click on the ads. If the fraud goes undetected, Google would send a check to the site owner.

Yahoo already employs algorithms and detection methods to fend off click fraud. The company is likely to use some oversight in allowing new publishing partners, according to a source

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • BarraPunto
  • Bitacoras.com
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes Fr
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • Blogosphere News
  • blogtercimlap
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • Current
  • Design Float
  • Diigo
  • DotNetKicks
  • DZone
  • eKudos
  • email
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • Fleck
  • FriendFeed
  • FSDaily
  • Global Grind
  • Gwar
  • HackerNews
  • Haohao
  • HealthRanker
  • HelloTxt
  • Hemidemi
  • Hyves
  • Identi.ca
  • IndianPad
  • Internetmedia
  • Kirtsy
  • laaik.it
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Linkter
  • Live
  • Meneame
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • MSN Reporter
  • muti
  • MyShare
  • MySpace
  • N4G
  • Netvibes
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • NuJIJ
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • Posterous
  • ppnow
  • Propeller
  • Ratimarks
  • Rec6
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • Scoopeo
  • Segnalo
  • Simpy
  • Slashdot
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Symbaloo
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Technorati
  • ThisNext
  • Tipd
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis
  • Upnews
  • Webnews.de
  • Webride
  • Wikio
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • Wists
  • Wykop
  • Xerpi
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Yigg